Back in 2011, the moment from the weekend that everyone was talking about was Blake Griffin's two-handed dunk over a "car", or at least to me that's what KIA and Sprite wanted you to believe. However what I saw was him jump over the front bumper. Not to say this isn't an incredible feat in itself, but I believe the fact that the car was one of the main sponsor's of the event swayed the vote in Griffin's favor. Prior to Blake Griffin's Dunk the car drove out onto the court with prestige and an entire chorus was present singing as it entered. In an event that has a well established history from Dr. J and Micheal Jordan's free-throw lime dunks, 5'7" Spud Webb's 360 dunk, to Vince Carter's 360 windmill, I believe that Blake Griffin jumping over his sponsor's car was in a way a cop-out. The other contestants in the 2011 competition stayed relatively true to the event, and one participant in particular showed more athleticism than the winner by dunking 3 basketballs, and also dunking on two hoops at once. With advertising creeping more and more into these events, I begin to wonder if the only way an athlete may win is with the help of their sponsors to create an eccentric brand infused dunk. Is it possible it could get as bad where athletes may not even dunk a ball but instead a box of Cheez-its, or dunk while applying their speed-stick deodorant?
Has their been a specific event or show where you felt the advertising began to effect the experience or outcome of the event?
No comments:
Post a Comment